The Role of Motion Sensitivity and Headaches on Vestibular Rehabilitation Outcomes in Pediatric Vestibular Migraines.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of the motion sensitivity quotient (MSQ) in diagnosing pediatric vestibular migraine (VM) and to characterize the role of motion sensitivity and headache control on vestibular rehabilitation (VR) outcomes in pediatric VM. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING: Pediatric tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Children (≤18 years old) with dizziness who completed vestibular testing from January 2016 to August 2022, diagnosed with either VM or another vestibular disorder. INTERVENTIONS: VR, which included MSQ testing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Initial MSQ, number and duration of vestibular physical therapy (PT) sessions, PT goals met, and posttreatment MSQ. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-seven patients met study criteria. MSQ was not a reliable diagnostic marker in pediatric VM as there was no difference in initial MSQ between VM and non-VM patients (9.4 vs. 7.8 in non-VM, p = 0.014). Both VM (n = 116) and non-VM (n = 141) patients demonstrated significant improvement in MSQ after VR (p = 0.004). However, VM patients tended to be less likely to meet at least one PT goal (60 vs. 77% in non-VM, p = 0.016, d = 0.37), although not significant. VM patients with more frequent headaches had significantly higher initial MSQ (p = 0.008). VM patients with more frequent headaches or higher initial MSQ tended to require increased number and longer duration of VR (small/medium effect size although not statistically significant after Bonferroni correction). CONCLUSION: VR is an effective treatment for both VM and non-VM pediatric patients. VM patients, especially those with severe motion sensitivity or poorly controlled headaches, may be less responsive to VR and may require increased frequency and duration of VR. Our findings propose the importance of counseling pediatric patients with severe motion sensitivity or uncontrolled migraines regarding realistic expectations of their VR course.

Vestibular pathology in children with enlarged vestibular aqueduct.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To establish the prevalence of abnormal vestibular test findings in children with enlarged vestibular aqueduct (EVA) and determine if these findings correlate with clinical symptoms, radiographic findings (EVA size and laterality), audiometric findings, and genetic testing in these patients. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort. METHODS: Patients 3 to 12 years of age with hearing loss and imaging findings consistent with EVA treated at our tertiary care institution were sequentially enrolled from 2009 to 2011. The following six outcome measurements were analyzed: audiometric findings, EVA laterality, temporal bone measurements, genetic testing, vestibular testing (cervical-evoked myogenic potentials, posturography, rotational chair, and calorics), and vestibular symptoms. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients with EVA (mean age 9.2 years, 48% female) were enrolled in and completed the study. Vertigo was reported in six patients. Twenty-four of 27 (89%) had at least one abnormal vestibular test result. Midpoint and operculum size correlated with directional preponderance (P = .042 and P = .032, respectively). Also, high-frequency pure tone average (HFPTA) correlated with unilateral weakness (P = .002). Walking at a later age correlated with abnormal posturography results. There was no correlation between EVA laterality and vestibular test findings. CONCLUSION: We found a high rate of vestibular pathology in children with EVA; however, the prevalence of abnormal vestibular test findings in this patient population was not correlated with vestibular symptoms. Enlarged vestibular aqueduct size, HFPTA, and walking at a later age were correlated with abnormal vestibular test findings. In view of these results, it may be prudent to consider vestibular testing in children with these clinical characteristics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b. Laryngoscope, 126:2344-2350, 2016.